Gordon is joined by James, a former Aurora resident, to talk about the situation there regarding the infestation of an apartment complex by violent gangs of Venezuelan invaders, and how the local city council seems unable or unwilling to do anything about them. The two also have a broader discussion on the nature of these sorts of invasive actions, and how both sides of the mainstream political spectrum respond.
This episode was released early to our generous subscribers. If you would like this sort of early access, as well as other exclusive content, please visit amerikaner.org/donate
Achtung! Amerikaner is proudly hosted on Amerikaner.org and ExodusAmericanus.com
UMMM THAT WAS SOME SERIOUS WHITESUPRECCIE AND IM SCARED AND DISGUSTED
Truly terrifying language…
I sent Gordon the unedited call I got from the Aurora, it’s pretty spicy and honestly, the tame guy was more effective in his approach than the call that got their panties in a wad.
If Gordon and I re-record the local politics episode here soon, we’ll touch on that again. Meanwhile, maybe Gordon can include the unedited call with this posting?
What is this “fall guy” crap? Promoting the gang takeover story is obfuscating, not revealing the issue. CBZ management, owned by Zev Baumgarten, a Chabad Jew from Brooklyn, was making millions working with NGOs that were receiving government cash to house migrants. The company eagerly worked with local NGOs to place migrants in housing units that were paid for by the government. It was only after Baumgarten was cited for dozens of code violations for failure to maintain his properties, that suddenly all conservative Jewish aligned media started pushing the gang takeover story.
So your argument is that the gangs aren’t a problem? Sorry man. I don’t think that him being a shitty jewish slumlord means all other problems don’t exist. You reflexively assuming anything conservatives say is wrong isn’t my concern.
Yeah Gordon. My only problem is that the slumlord is Jewish. I would be totally fine with the Third World destroying White countries as long as all the slumlords were White. Clearly that’s what I wrote the first time.
A working-class guy is merely “wrong” for not knowing his media of choice is lying to him when they talk about crime but leave out race or the Jewish institutional power that makes solving those issues impossible. You reflexively defending conservative media for lying to him in that way is an odd thing to be unconcerned about, unless you just want him to be lied to.
I didn’t “defend conservative media.” I pointed out, on my show, that this jewish slumlord was allowed to exist by the system and his existence is one of the factors that led to the gangs.
Conservative media downplayed the slumlord, liberal media tried to argue the slumlord was the only problem. My coverage pointed out both was an issue, yet you come here acting as if I’m running cover for the slumlord. Clearly at least some of the media is happy to suggest it’s all a hoax made up by this slumlord, which is what James was saying by “fall guy”.
As I said during the episode, I’m going by the evidence I have available. Again, assuming the passed housing inspections are legit this either means 1. they bought off the city inspectors to get a favorable rating (possible, but as high profile as this situation is, very risky for all involved) or 2. they did pass their housing inspections and were cited for the criminal nuisance complaints they were eventually shut down for by the city.
Yes, jews suck and we hate them – that’s a given and no argument here on that – but that said, something here isn’t adding up for me. Either they were taking care of their properties until the gangs took over (and again, the evidence I have available suggests this is the case since they pulled their local teams out after they were attacked by the TdA gangbangers) or they were not taking care of their properties and the city didn’t care until crime got out of control and became a national issue.
The latter IS a possibility, I will grant you, but again, it would be very easy for the city to simply throw their housing inspectors under the bus and blame them for passing poorly maintained properties, which has not happened yet to my knowledge. Or likewise, the city would have simply shut them down for the housing issues rather than the criminal nuisance issues.
As much as we may want to react on pure emotions and kneejerk that “jews suck” – sometimes Occam’s razor is in play and we have to go with the more likely explanation here based on the evidence available to us.
Again, I do not deny that a lot of jewish landlords (and even non-jews like in the several areas of Ohio and Pennsylvania) are incentivized to rent to illegals and quasi-illegals (i.e. “temporary” refugee status) because the govt is willing to pay the jacked up rent charged no questions asked and no strings attached. Even so, they wouldn’t likely risk having their rentals shut down if they can avoid it because they DO want to make that money, correct?