First, a little background. Shortly after the insidious doxxing of Riggin Scheer, and his subsequent interview with Dakota News Now, I proposed a meeting between Riggin and myself as well as Jen Dreiske, the Chief Operations Officer of a pro-illegal immigrant group called South Dakota Voices for Peace (as well as a disgraced former official of the state’s correctional department) in an effort to discuss some of the many issues facing young Whites, in particular White men in this our current Weimerican Republic. The following is a letter that was emailed directly to her at her organization (jen@southdakotavoicesforpeace.org) that she has, as of the writing of this article, completely ignored.
Hello,
My name is {REDACTED}, and I am writing to inquire as to your interest in meeting for an open discussion relating to what you term racism and White supremacy. This is in response to your statements regarding Mr. Scheer, who will also be present along with me at this proposed meeting.
We feel that in order to work towards a safe and amiable society, dialogue requires hearing from all stakeholders. Likewise, if you wish truly to solve the issue of White supremacy, as you term it, then it would be wise to better understand those you would challenge in that effort.
Further, we feel that unless you truly understand the reasons why a substantial segment of White men and women consider there is no future for them in our nation – particularly younger generations, and especially those disenfranchised youth who have zero institutional power in this society and that older generations have long left behind and ignored their concerns completely.
We feel that our very existence is under attack by the larger society on a daily basis. Our children are exposed to concepts and activities that, just a decade or so ago, were considered at minimum distasteful, and at the extreme end of the spectrum, abhorrent by most of our society. Our political, social, and economic leaders sell our young White men and women a bill of goods of “progressive” concepts while simultaneously teaching them to hate themselves and one another for their very skin color and ancestry.
Further, we would cite the rising opioid and fentanyl epidemic killing thousands of our young men and women every year as additional evidence that our lives as White men and women are considered without value, as our government and media at all levels has completely ignored this issue entirely.
As young White men have been increasingly excluded from academia and the workforce, and with little options for pursuing a family or other long-term goals in our broken society, many turn to drugs as a method of coping with this half-living existence our political and socio-economic leaders have imposed on them – others will inevitably lash out at society so long as this systemic oppression and methodical genocide continues.
To conclude, we welcome dialogue and wish to meet with you and perhaps the other parishioner mentioned in the Dakota News Now piece, Matilda Oppenheimer, at a neutral location and a time that is most convenient for all parties.
It is our hope and intention that we can work towards resolving some of these long standing issues before they metastasize into larger more uncontrollable conflicts. As we young White men lack any institutional power in our modern society, we must needs rely on individuals such as yourself who have that institutional power more readily available to them in an effort to not only work towards bettering the future of our young White men and women, but in so doing, it will help to stave off greater animosity between our population and those who possess the institutional means to improve our lot and yet refuse to do so.
Thank you for your time and attention on this matter.
Sincerely,
{REDACTED}
By her unwillingness to dialogue, we can only conclude that she favors the status quo, and favors the small handful of detrimental social effects that were laid out in this letter. This letter could have, of course, been much longer, with many more examples of the oppression faced by young White men in this the nation our ancestors fought, built, bled, and died to create. Likewise, we can only conclude that she is entirely unserious about addressing the rising “antisemitism” and “White supremacy” she so readily bemoans publicly, as she was given a chance to discuss these matters and hear a different viewpoint and a differing set of grievances.
The fact remains that she, not we, have the institutional power to affect real social change in our society, not just due to her status as a jew (which affords her a great deal of latitude in all things political largely due to the talisman of the Holocaust) but also due to her status as a woman and as a member of the Baby Boomer generation. When she speaks, politicians listen and will do their best to accommodate her demands. However, when we speak, we are vilified, ignored, mocked, and harassed.
In a truly White Supremacist nation, this would certainly not logically be the case. The burden of proof remains on her to prove she is sincere about resolving the coming social strife before it’s too late to address it.
Jews killed Christ