An important message from The White Nationalist Women’s Committee – Dating Division’s Spokeswoman, Pearl, submitted to Amerikaner. If you would like to submit your own content, please email amerikanercontributions@proton.me
The White Nationalist Women’s Committee – Dating Division has declared tattoos on women to be acceptable.
Yes, yes, I see all of you purists out there cringing but don’t worry – the Committee is working on men’s behalf, too.
The White Nationalist Women’s Committee – Dating Division has declared splitting the bill to be acceptable and an insufficient reason to turn down a second date.
Do I have everyone’s attention and ire now?
Good.
We all grew up in this new world order and it has changed courtship and marriage in inescapable ways. Every person is entitled to their deal breakers but too often I hear the complaint that women are no longer women. It’s not invalid and on the other side of the fence, women are saying the same thing about men. Everyone is right.
The “trad wife” aesthetic is rising on social media. Aprons are in and sex on the first date is out. Yet, those women are accused of gaming the system and faking traditional behaviors to find a man. This is of course true in its way.
Many of us have had gay friends, or jewish friends or black friends. We have gotten tattoos and piercings. We have had premarital sex,
sometimes more than once. We have gone through the indoctrination camp that is the US education system and come out with foolish ideas. We have notions about relationships that would appall our great-grandparents.
Not a single one of us would know what to do if a DeLorean showed up at our door to bring us to 1950. Given this, let us all be charitable with each other. It is important to come together on values and life goals. It is not the case that the past does not matter. Make sure, however, that the present matters more.
With all of this in mind, The White Nationalist Women’s Committee – Dating Division sets forth the following areas of required compatibility:
- Similar religious values
- Desire for children & similar ideas for childrearing
- Desire for marriage
- Physical attraction
- Values surrounding sex including but not limited to past liaisons
- Levels of dominance (leadership) and submission (agreeableness)
The White Nationalist Women’s Committee – Dating Division sets forth the following non-negotiable red flags:
- jews
hoes mad
As a WN man soon to hit 30, I’m doing my best to knock my younger peers’ unreasonable expectations of women that they are anxious with even locking eyes with, let alone approaching to strike up casual conversation. Ladies, we’re out here trying to help our brothers and we recognize y’all for doing the same; Hail our women folk! We shall ensure our existence and a future for our children!
It is evident that you lack maturity and experience in a genuine relationship. Your points hold no value and are merely an appeal to evoke negative emotions from people whom you should be communing with. The same people you allegedly hold the same values as based upon the location of this article. Sounds kinda Jewish, or rather lunar, to me.
Your two first points negate the fact that our values explicitly oppose the ways of the modern world. It doesn’t matter if you have tattoos, what matters is that after experiencing that they bring little value to a person or their identity that we should not advocate for people to look for a sense of identity and value in material things. Whether it’s tattoos, piercings, vehicles, clothing, make-up, etc. All material things have their utility, however, they should not define a person. Your identity should lie with your people and your shared values with those people.
Your next point was about how things have changed in Marriage and Courtship because of the new world order. Yes, because they have allowed women to have an opinion. Ironic I know, as I am a woman as well; however, I speak truth to our values whereas you appeal to the populace major. We stand against the ways of the modern world because they condone things that go directly against our newfound values after discovering that modern ways are leading directly to the destruction of our people. Which is why a non negotiable is to have desires to procreate… to continue our genetic lineage.
You then proceed to try to appeal back to our apparent shared values that you negated throughout your whole article.
Your article is exactly why women should not be in positions of authority or be allowed to have an opinion. Because women like what appeals to their emotions and are willing to compromise their values and beliefs to feel good about themselves for even just a moment. Maybe you should heal your feelings of inadequacy before trying to convince the rest of us to compromise our values. We’ve all made mistakes, but what are you doing today to bring truth to our values? Stop compromising.
As for the points made by the “Dating Division,” do they have actual descriptions that go into more detail about each point? Why is each point relevant and important?
I can articulate why, but I’d rather see that that is already an expectation from these people. Without description and reasoning people are unlikely to care to listen or understand.
That’s what the article should have been about, not some shitty appeal to make people mad.
Good article. Simple dating advice for white guys to consider. Based on comments to this and Myles’ response, it might be that people are overthinking it.
Put differently, I know a lot of smart white guys in Europe and the US, and they’re late forties that still haven’t started a family. Most women I know seem to want to have a family if they haven’t already started one. Seems reasonable to discuss how folks might get beyond that particular impasse. Not much point in just talking about how hopeless dating is.